Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ADL) Model

Let’s imagine you have a toy train set. You want to know how fast your train will go today. But your train’s speed doesn’t just depend on what you do right now—it also depends on what happened yesterday, and maybe the day before, and even what your friend did with their train!

An Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ADL) model is like a recipe that helps you figure out today’s train speed by looking at:

  • How fast your train was going yesterday and the day before (that’s the “autoregressive” part—using your own past speeds)
  • What your friend did with their train yesterday and before (that’s the “distributed lag” part—using your friend’s past actions)

So, if you want to know today’s speed, you look at:

  • Your speed yesterday
  • Your speed two days ago
  • Your friend’s speed yesterday
  • Your friend’s speed two days ago

You add all these together in a special way, and that gives you a good guess for today!

In short:

  • ADL models help us predict what happens today by looking at what happened in the past, both for ourselves and for others.

Before we go deeper, can you tell me if you’ve ever seen or used something like this before—maybe in a game, with weather, or with anything that changes over time? 1

⁂

Heard about it

Great! Since you’ve heard about ADL models, let’s build on that foundation.

Think of it like this: imagine you’re trying to predict how happy you’ll be tomorrow. An ADL model says your happiness depends on:

Your own past happiness (autoregressive part):

  • How happy were you yesterday?
  • How happy were you the day before?

Other things that happened before (distributed lag part):

  • Did it rain yesterday? (weather affects mood)
  • Did it rain two days ago?
  • Did your friend visit yesterday?
  • Did your friend visit two days ago?

The “distributed lag” means we spread out the effects over several days—maybe rain from two days ago still affects you a little bit today!

So the ADL model is like a formula: Tomorrow’s Happiness = Some of yesterday’s happiness + Some of day-before’s happiness + Some of yesterday’s rain + Some of day-before’s rain + Some of yesterday’s friend visit + …

Each “some of” has a different weight—maybe yesterday’s happiness matters more than happiness from two days ago.

Does this make sense so far? Can you think of another example where today depends on what happened yesterday AND the day before?

maybe sleep time

Exactly! Sleep time is a perfect example.

Let’s say you want to know how much energy you’ll have today. Your energy today depends on:

  • How much you slept last night (that’s like yesterday’s sleep)
  • How much you slept two nights ago (maybe you’re still tired from then!)
  • Other things that happened before (like if you played a lot yesterday, or ate a big dinner)

So, an ADL model for your energy might look like:

Today’s Energy = Some of last night’s sleep + Some of the night before’s sleep + Some of yesterday’s playtime + …

The model helps you see how much each thing from the past matters for today.

Quick check:

  • If you slept badly two nights in a row, do you think your energy today would be high or low? Why?

energy today will mostly probably be low because of less sleep

Perfect! That’s exactly the idea behind an ADL model.

  • If you slept less both nights, your energy today is low.
  • The model helps us see how much each night’s sleep (and maybe other things) affects your energy today.

Quick Recap

  • ADL models use what happened on previous days (like sleep, play, or even weather) to predict what happens today.
  • Each past event gets its own weight—some things matter more than others.

Would you like to see a simple example with numbers, or try making your own little ADL formula for something else in your life?

i want to see a simple example with numbers

Here is a simple example with numbers for an ADL model predicting today’s energy:

We imagine today’s energy depends on:

  • Sleep from yesterday and two days ago
  • Playtime from yesterday and two days ago

The model formula is:

$$ \text{Today Energy} = a_0 + a_1 \times \text{Sleep yesterday} + a_2 \times \text{Sleep two days ago} + a_3 \times \text{Play yesterday} + a_4 \times \text{Play two days ago} $$

Where the weights (how much each thing matters) are:

  • $a_0 = 10$ (base energy)
  • $a_1 = 2$ (last night’s sleep very important)
  • $a_2 = 1$ (sleep two nights ago a bit less)
  • $a_3 = 0.5$ (playtime yesterday matters a bit)
  • $a_4 = 0.2$ (playtime two days ago matters a little)

If you slept 6 hours yesterday, 4 hours the night before, played 2 hours yesterday, and 3 hours two days ago, then:

$$ \text{Today Energy} = 10 + 2 \times 6 + 1 \times 4 + 0.5 \times 2 + 0.2 \times 3 = 27.6 $$

So, your energy level today would be 27.6 on this scale.

This is a small example of how the ADL model uses past values with different weights to predict today’s outcome! Would you like to try making a similar model for something else?

what does the result mean, interpret it

Great question! Let’s interpret the result together.

In our example, the ADL model gave us 27.6 as your energy level today.

What does “27.6” mean?

  • It’s a score that tells us how much energy you might have today, based on your sleep and playtime from the last two days.
  • The higher the number, the more energy you have.
  • The lower the number, the less energy you have.

How do we use it?

  • If you get a score like 27.6, and you know that scores above 25 mean you feel energetic, you can expect to feel pretty good today.
  • If your score was 15, you might feel tired and need more rest.

The model helps you predict how you’ll feel, so you can plan your day!

Quick Review

  • The result is a prediction, not a guarantee.
  • It uses your past sleep and play to guess your energy.
  • You can compare scores from different days to see what helps you feel better.

Can you think of a way you might use this kind of prediction in your daily life?

maybe it can help in predicting the muscle growth by utilizing the past gym reps and exercise data and my diet (eg , protein in take, etc)

That’s a fantastic idea! An ADL model can definitely help predict muscle growth by using past gym reps, exercise routines, and diet factors like protein intake.2

Using ADL for Muscle Growth

  • The model would look at your gym reps and sets from previous days, protein eaten on different days, and maybe your sleep or rest days.
  • It would suggest how much those past activities and food intake affect your muscle growth today.
  • For example, lifting more weights yesterday or eating extra protein two days ago might mean more muscle growth now.

You’d get a number (just like the energy example) showing how much muscle growth to expect, based on your actions and diet over time.2

This helps you adjust your routine—like knowing when to work harder or eat better for more progress!

⁂

lets move further into this topic only if anything left

You have now seen how an ADL model can use past gym reps, exercise routines, and protein intake to predict muscle growth. This approach lets you find out which habits boost results and how fast your body responds to changes in workouts or nutrition.

What’s next or left in this topic?

  • You can add more variables (like sleep, water intake, or rest days) for even more accurate predictions.
  • If you want to go deeper, you could learn about how to choose the best time lags—which days in the past matter most to your muscles today.3
  • You could also explore how to estimate the numbers (coefficients) that tell you how much each variable matters, usually using computer software and real data.3

If you want, the next steps could be learning how this is done with real fitness data or seeing how to build a simple ADL model in a spreadsheet or basic code for your stats. Let me know if you’d like to take those steps!You are absolutely right—an ADL model could help predict muscle growth by looking at past gym reps, exercise data, and diet factors such as protein intake.

This means the model might be built like:

  • Today’s muscle growth depends on how many reps were done yesterday and two days ago
  • It also depends on how much protein was consumed on the days before
  • Other things, like total calories or even past rest days, could be included as lags too

This lets you see patterns in your progress over time and understand what combination of past behavior best predicts changes in muscle growth.That’s a fantastic idea! An ADL model can definitely help predict muscle growth by using past gym reps, exercise routines, and diet factors like protein intake.3

Using ADL for Muscle Growth

  • The model would look at your gym reps and sets from previous days, protein eaten on different days, and maybe your sleep or rest days.
  • It would suggest how much those past activities and food intake affect your muscle growth today.
  • For example, lifting more weights yesterday or eating extra protein two days ago might mean more muscle growth now.

You’d get a number (just like the energy example) showing how much muscle growth to expect, based on your actions and diet over time.3

This helps you adjust your routine—like knowing when to work harder or eat better for more progress!That’s exactly how ADL models can be useful in real life! If you keep track of reps, weights, what you eat (like your protein grams), and other things like rest or supplements for several days, an ADL model can combine all that old information to help predict your muscle gains today.3

  • For example: Muscle Growth Today = Some of yesterdays gym reps + Some of two days ago’s protein + Some of three days ago’s rest + …
  • It tells you how each past activity or dietary habit contributes, and helps you learn what matters most for your progress.

People use these models in sports science and fitness research to improve workout planning and nutrition!You have now seen how an ADL model can use past gym reps, exercise routines, and protein intake to predict muscle growth. This approach lets you find out which habits boost results and how fast your body responds to changes in workouts or nutrition.

What’s next or left in this topic?

  • You can add more variables (like sleep, water intake, or rest days) for even more accurate predictions.
  • If you want to go deeper, you could learn about how to choose the best time lags—which days in the past matter most to your muscles today.3
  • You could also explore how to estimate the numbers (coefficients) that tell you how much each variable matters, usually using computer software and real data.3

If you want, the next steps could be learning how this is done with real fitness data or seeing how to build a simple ADL model in a spreadsheet or basic code for your stats. Let me know if you’d like to take those steps!You’ve covered the main ideas of the ADL model using real-life examples like muscle growth. If you want to move further, the only big topics left would be:

  • How to actually calculate and estimate the weights (“coefficients”) using real gym and diet data—usually this needs a computer or calculator.
  • How to decide which “lags” (how many days back) are most important for your muscles and health.
  • How to check if the model’s predictions match what really happens (by comparing its predictions to what you record over time).

If you want, the next step could be building a simple ADL model with actual numbers from daily workout and diet logs! Let me know if you’d like to try that, or anything even more advanced.

⁂

what i mean to move further into the topic is that any concept left to be understand in this ADL model topic, if there is something left then teach that or tell me that we’re done with topic

All the main ideas for understanding the ADL (Autoregressive Distributed Lag) model have now been covered. Here is a quick check for any important concepts that might be left:

Key Concepts in ADL Models

  • What ADL models do: Predict today using past values of itself and other things (like diet or gym reps).4
  • Choosing the number of lags: Picking how many past days to include is important; too few misses important history, too many makes the model complicated and less accurate.4
  • Different weights: Each lagged value (like protein eaten yesterday vs. two days ago) can matter differently—those weights are found by looking at real data.4
  • Limitations: ADL models work best when there is no feedback; if today’s muscle growth could also change tomorrow’s diet, more advanced models are needed.4
  • Extensions: Sometimes, more than one variable’s history matters, and there could be seasonal effects—these require special versions of the model.4
  • Model checking: After building the model, always check if the predictions make sense and if leftovers (errors) look random—otherwise, the model needs fixing.4

You’re Done!

Everything necessary to understand ADL models—what they do, how they work, how to build and test them, and their limitations—has been covered. If you want, you can now use the idea for muscle growth, fitness, or any pattern that depends on history. All other details are about using computer tools or applying advanced variants, which are extra steps for specialized research.

Let me know if you want other real-life examples or help building one for your personal data! Otherwise, you are now finished learning the ADL model topic.4

⁂

Why Should Errors Look Random in Regression Models?

When we build a regression model (like an ADL model), we use past data to predict what happens today. The errors (also called residuals) are the differences between what the model predicts and what actually happens.

Why do we want errors to look random?

  • If errors look random:
    • It means our model has captured all the important patterns in the data.
    • There are no leftover trends, cycles, or predictable patterns that the model missed.
    • The model is well-specified and trustworthy for prediction and inference.
  • If errors do NOT look random (for example, they show a pattern or are correlated over time):
    • It means the model missed something important—maybe a variable, a lag, or a trend.
    • The predictions and statistical tests (like t-tests or F-tests) can be misleading or invalid.
    • The model might not be reliable for forecasting or understanding relationships.

In simple terms:

Random errors mean the model has done its job well. Non-random errors mean the model needs improvement.

This is why, after fitting a model, we always check the errors. If they look like random noise (no pattern, no autocorrelation), we can trust our results. If not, we need to fix the model—maybe by adding more lags, variables, or adjusting the structure.5

Would you like to see how to check if errors are random, or learn what to do if they aren’t?

⁂

how to know that the model has random error

Great question! To know if your model has random errors (also called residuals), you need to check if the errors show any pattern or if they look like random noise. Here’s how you can do that in practice:

1. Plot the Residuals

  • Residual vs. Fitted Plot: After fitting your model, plot the errors (residuals) on the y-axis and the predicted values (fitted values) on the x-axis.
    • What you want: The points should be scattered randomly around zero, with no clear pattern, shape, or trend.
    • What you don’t want: If you see a curve, trend, or clusters, it means the errors are not random and your model is missing something important.

2. Check for Autocorrelation (especially in time series)

  • Autocorrelation means errors from one time period are related to errors from another.
  • How to check:
    • Plot residuals over time: They should bounce up and down randomly, not follow a wave or trend.
    • Durbin-Watson test: This is a statistical test that checks if errors are correlated over time. A value close to 2 means little autocorrelation; much lower or higher means there is a pattern.

3. Check for Normality (optional, for some models)

  • Histogram or Q-Q plot: The errors should look roughly like a bell curve (normal distribution), but this is less important than randomness for most models.

4. Why is this important?

  • If errors are random, your model has captured all the predictable patterns in the data, and your predictions and statistical tests are trustworthy.
  • If errors are not random, your model is missing something (like a variable, a lag, or a trend), and predictions or inferences may be misleading.

In summary:

  • Plot your residuals and look for randomness.
  • Use tests like Durbin-Watson for time series.
  • If you see patterns, try improving your model by adding variables, lags, or changing the structure.

Would you like to see an example of a residual plot or learn how to run a Durbin-Watson test? 6

⁂

  1. Applied-Econometric-Time-Series.pdf ↩︎

  2. Applied-Econometric-Time-Series.pdf ↩︎ ↩︎

  3. Applied-Econometric-Time-Series.pdf ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  4. Applied-Econometric-Time-Series.pdf ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  5. Introductory-Econometrics-A-Modern-Approach.pdf ↩︎

  6. Introductory-Econometrics-A-Modern-Approach.pdf ↩︎